I’ve posted a number of times about two nearly-lifelong studies: the Terman Study (covered in The Longevity Project) and the Grant Study (covered in Triumphs of Experience.)
While different in some respects, both followed a sample of people from youth until death and provided insights into what makes for a happy, healthy life.
What two big ideas do they both strongly agree on?
1) A Happy Childhood Matters More Than You Think
Vaillant concludes that a loving
childhood is one of the best predictors of mid and late-life riches: “We
found that contentment in the late seventies was not even suggestively
associated with parental social class or even the man’s own income. What
it was significantly associated with was warmth of childhood
environment, and it was very significantly associated with a man’s
closeness to his father.”
Via The Longevity Project: Surprising Discoveries for Health and Long Life from the Landmark Eight-Decade Study:
The long-term health effects of
parental divorce were often devastating— it was indeed a risky
circumstance that changed the pathways of many of the young Terman
participants. Children from divorced families died almost five years
earlier on average than children from intact families. Parental divorce,
not parental death, was the risk. In fact, parental divorce during
childhood was the single strongest social predictor of early death, many
years into the future.
2) Relationships are the Most Important Thing
…connecting with and helping others is more important than obsessing over a rigorous exercise program.
Via The Longevity Project: Surprising Discoveries for Health and Long Life from the Landmark Eight-Decade Study:
We figured that if a Terman participant
sincerely felt that he or she had friends and relatives to count on when
having a hard time then that person would be healthier. Those who felt
very loved and cared for, we predicted, would live the longest.
Surprise: our prediction was wrong… Beyond social network size,
the clearest benefit of social relationships came from helping others.
Those who helped their friends and neighbors, advising and caring for
others, tended to live to old age.
Via Flourish: A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Well-being:
Vaillant’s insight came from his seminal
work on the Grant Study, an almost seventy-year (and ongoing)
longitudinal investigation of the developmental trajectories of Harvard
College graduates. (This study is also referred to as the Harvard
Study.) In a study led by Derek Isaacowitz, we found that the
capacity to love and be loved was the single strength most clearly
associated with subjective well-being at age eighty.
Vaillant’s other main interest is the power of relationships. “It is social aptitude,” he writes, “not intellectual brilliance or parental social class, that leads to successful aging.” Warm connections are necessary—and if not found in a mother or father, they can come from siblings, uncles, friends, mentors. The men’s relationships at age 47, he found, predicted late-life adjustment better than any other variable, except defenses. Good
sibling relationships seem especially powerful: 93 percent of the men
who were thriving at age 65 had been close to a brother or sister when
younger. In an interview in the March 2008 newsletter to the
Grant Study subjects, Vaillant was asked, “What have you learned from
the Grant Study men?” Vaillant’s response: “That the only thing that
really matters in life are your relationships to other people.”
“Is there someone in your life whom you would feel comfortable phoning at four in the morning to tell your troubles to?”
Is there someone in your life
whom you would feel comfortable phoning at four in the morning to tell
your troubles to? If your answer is yes, you will likely live longer
than someone whose answer is no. For George Vaillant, the Harvard
psychiatrist who discovered this fact, the master strength is the
capacity to be loved.
Source: http://www.bakadesuyo.com/2013/03/lifelong-studies-agree-living-long-happy-life/
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario